I tend to take complaints from people who is unable to see pages in their browser serious. My main reason for having pages w3c-validated is to avoid mails from helpful people who finds it their duty to point out that some pages didn't validate succssfully. You can solve this by writing your own DTD and use that one as document type. You get pages that can be validated and you still have the freedom to use old attributes and tags that are required to get really old browsers to do what you want.
/ Martin Nilsson (Fake Build Master)
Previous text:
2002-10-18 21:54: Subject: Autodocs in the latest 7.3
I'm aware of that, but at least HTML validated by w3c gives us a starting point when talking to people who moan that their favorite browser doesn't render something correctly. Please take a look at http://caudium.net/ - it's a good example of a page that looks good in the modern browsers while it validates with the w3c validator - the only sections not being validated now are the pike autodocs and the caudium autodocs (which use the Pike autodocs system, slightly modified for our purpose).
/ Marek Habersack (Grendel)