but datatypes, syntax and the other things are not modules,
what i meant is that in terms of the title 'module tree' the reference is complete as it does indeed cover all modules and functions.
but those are just nitpicks. it just strikes me odd every time i go over that page.
what would be really nice is to have a manual/reference containing only things that are not in the module tree reference.
pages like http://pike.ida.liu.se/generated/manual/ref/chapter_16.html are not really practical, and i believe all of that is in the module tree anyways.
(still looking for the complete definition of inherit) (maybe it's time for me to apply for cvs access :-)
greetings, martin.