Re: More about ADTs

I don't want operators which you can not reach from a ASCII-terminal, but that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be possible to code with "difficult" characters. We already accept identifiers from the full unicode character realm.

/ Martin Nilsson (Fake Build Master)

Previous text:

2002-11-11 21:38: Subject: Re: More about ADTs

---

The only fancy operators I remember was from the upper half of latin

1. And I don't think it's a good idea to add fancy characters for

operators. It's fine for languages like APL, I guess, which were designed from the start to have lots of fancy operators and compact syntax, but pike code should look reasonably similar to C.

/ Niels Möller ()