28 Jul
2008
28 Jul
'08
4:45 p.m.
Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
Is this a result of misinterpreting the first CVS commit after the split as the split itself? I think this should be fixed. I have a list of good dates to insert synthetic commits for all the splits.
What is the point of inserting synthetic commits for the splits? I.e. it's not clear to me if it solves anything.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Even if man could understand women, he still wouldn't believe it."