25 Feb
2003
25 Feb
'03
6:05 a.m.
Yes - it probably shows people have not used this much in Pike yet, so there is some polishing left to do. (To get a nice big rational number here, I can't go lower than adding 1e-45; anything smaller is lost.)
/ Johan Sundström (a hugging punishment!)
Previous text:
2003-02-25 11:58: Subject: Re: Do we have a floatingpoint bug?
Wierd. It can represent them, though, so it's probably just create(). Try "Gmp.mpq(1)+1e-50".
/ Mirar