25 May
2008
25 May
'08
4:16 a.m.
Bertrand LUPART wrote:
It *is* a bit odd, but it used to be the default behaviour, so it was made like that for compatibility reasons, iirc. These things are old... :)
One can expect that an RXML entity can output another RXML entity, which would then be parsed.
I'm not fond of RXML as a programming language, but out of curiosity, what is the expected behaviour?
The parser in Roxen for RXML usually evaluates one level deep, and doesn't reparse; in order for it to reparse, you need to <eval> the new part explicitly.
--
Sincerely, srb@cuci.nl
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Technology is stuff that doesn't work yet." -- Bran Ferren
"We no longer think of chairs as technology." -- Douglas Adams