9 Aug
2004
9 Aug
'04
5:30 a.m.
No, ensuring non-zero size does not change the fact that malloc(X*Y*foo+1) allocates an odd size.
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)
Previous text:
2004-08-09 11:23: Subject: Image.Image
That is obviously what I'm trying to find the best way to do. Ensuring non-zero size on creation is one way.
/ Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks)