Special sscanf seems less necessary nowadays when you can write
[a, b] = array_sscanf(format, s);
(and if this is ever the "official" way of using sscanf, the "array_" prefix should of course be deleted).
/ Niels Möller (igelkottsräddare)
Previous text:
2003-12-23 03:05: Subject: Re: C#-like properties
gauge & catch should be done with implicit lambdas or something that achives the same thing. (And if possible without performance penalty, so should for, if and while...)
I've been dreaming of converting :: from being 100% syntax to becoming a part of the identifiers themselves. Or, solved entirely with named scopes (similar to python). However, that might not be solvable.
sscanf would probably be the last thing to go on my list, because it's soo damn convenient... :)
/ Fredrik (Naranek) Hubinette (Real Build Master)