6 Mar
2003
6 Mar
'03
11:55 a.m.
Speaking of copy_value, I've often missed a copying function that isn't recursive. That's another one that doesn't exist only because noone found a good name for it. The best I can think of is "copy_level".
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-03-06 10:36: Subject: negative indices in array ranges
For an operation that gives a new array, I think copy is a good name. Then you could call it without the range parameters to get a copy of the whole array as well.
Hm, maybe the range parameters should simply be added to copy_value?
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)