pike -x module is a new build system.
Let's generate aclocal.m4 from pike, then you would not complain about that file, right?
Then we put the information in the current dynamic_module_makefile in lib/modules/Tools.pmod/Build.pmod or somthing similar.
Would that be better?
Note that nothing would really be differnt. But anal debian maintainers would probably be happier.
Personally I think it would be pointless to do all this work for nothing, though.
/ Per Hedbor ()
Previous text:
2004-01-26 21:38: Subject: Re: Pike @ Debian
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:10:03PM +0100, Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum scribbled:
Perhaps it would be better to stop using autoconf entirely. Nobody seems to complain about Make.pl files, so perhaps that's the way to go.
I would be more than happy. There's pmk and numerous other systems of configuring software. pmk is maturing, so it might be an option in the near feature. But then, who will convert the current build system to a new standard? I would just hope that no pike would be necessary to generate the makefiles
marek
/ Brevbäraren