22 Dec
2017
22 Dec
'17
7:18 a.m.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg srb@cuci.nl wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
before calling gtk_object_destroy. Any idea why? Is there a situation in which destroy() might have been called with arguments, such that it shouldn't actually destroy anything?
I can only guess, but maybe it was being called explictly from some places in the code with a dummy argument to distinguish it from the real _destruct() called by Pike internals.
Hmm. I can't find any, but that doesn't necessarily prove it. I'll keep an eye out for inexplicable GTK widget destruction as a potential clue.
ChrisA