Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum wrote:
As long as you don't break compilation and doc generation and make the appropriate CHANGES entries.
Quick question about naming the cmod. I currently ad-hoc named it PGsql. Consequently I have a PGsql/PGsql.cmod etc.
Is there any point in naming it something like _pgsql/_pgsql.cmod instead? It's a class that is not meant to be called by anyone besides my Sql/pgsql.pike driver.