9 Aug
2004
9 Aug
'04
7:15 a.m.
Traditinally, the only way to get a 0xY or Xx0 sized image is because of a bug in scale().
I don't think anything will break if everything starts to protest for zero-sized images.
/ Mirar
Previous text:
2004-08-08 21:48: Subject: Image.Image
Is there any reason why Pike should accept a 0*0 image objects (or n*0 or 0*n for that matter)?
/ Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks)