30 Jan
2003
30 Jan
'03
10:35 a.m.
Well, it reduces the problem, but doesn't *solve* it. Consider a C module calling a pike function that raises an exception.
/ Niels Möller ()
Previous text:
2003-01-30 16:24: Subject: Re: OpenSSL wrapper vs Pike's SSL (Was: Bz2)
Far from pointless, I think, since it still solves the by far more serious problem with accidental printouts in backtraces etc. But a really good solution should address this too, and that's why I wrote PCHARP and not struct pike_string in 9670457. (PCHARP comes from global.h and is a char * together with a size shift.)
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS