30 Jan
2003
30 Jan
'03
10:35 a.m.
Ah, yes of course. My mistake. Then we could either reuse struct pike_string (without requiring that it points to an interned string), or add a new struct for this (which might be better to avoid mistakes with mixups between interned and uninterned pike_strings).
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-01-30 16:28: Subject: Re: OpenSSL wrapper vs Pike's SSL (Was: Bz2)
You should get a pointer, a size shift, *and* a length, I hope?
/ Niels Möller ()