9 Nov
2008
9 Nov
'08
10 a.m.
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 02:35:03PM +0000, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum wrote:
/.../ the reverse takes little time compared to the search.
Right.. If that were true, it'd be a very bad outcome indeed for all Hubbes efforts optimizing that beast.
if what were true? or is there a 'not' missing? (if it were not true that reverse() takes little time)
would a reverse_search() be much faster than search(reverse()) even if it is less optimized than search()?
greetings, martin.