10 Nov
2002
10 Nov
'02
11:55 a.m.
Hmm, I can't think of any that doesn't have parsing problems. All I've concluded so far is that it's damn unfortunate that +=, -= etc have the copy semantics they do. :(
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2002-11-10 16:08: Subject: More about ADTs
Yes. Some sort of global function corresponding to m_delete for the insert operation will also be necessary for the new multisets. To be consistent it should then be called m_insert, but I don't particularly like the "m_" prefix in this case either. (As it happens, it works for multisets too, but the operation is really more fundamental than that.)
Perhaps we can come up with a new operator syntax instead?
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS