29 Mar
2010
29 Mar
'10
9:37 a.m.
Hi Stephen,
Ok. Could you (or anyone else?) tell me more about this, so I can take this into account? Does this mean that Roxen can control the or has its own garbage collector?
Coen
On 3/29/2010 15:31, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
Coen Schalkwijk wrote:
Is this something you might expect when using threads (global vars gone but function still active) or is this a (Pike) problem?
This has something to do with the way the Roxen modules operate, not with Pike(classes) in general.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards / mit besten Grüßen,
Coen Schalkwijk
Software Engineer
coen.schalkwijk@rtl.nl mailto:coen.schalkwijk@rtl.nl
coen@rtlinteractief.nl mailto:coen@rtlinteractief.nl
+31 (0)35 671 8915
