I don't really know why we have kept the Ssleay module. I doubt it even works. What's wrong with the SSL module, or more to the point, what is better with OpenSSL?
/ Martin Nilsson (Åskblod)
Previous text:
2003-01-26 01:03: Subject: Re: Bz2
Le samedi, 25 jan 2003, à 21:24 Europe/Paris, Martin Baehr a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:30:01PM +0100, David Hedbor @ Pike developers forum wrote:
So what was wrong with the bzip2 module that was in Pexts since a few years back, out of curiosity?
the fact that nobody took the code and inserted it into the main repository. i don't think that allowing pexts to be added to pike is enough, those who wrote pext need to take the code actively merge it.
it's not going to happen by itself...
So maybe we (me, david, or grendel since we have rw access to pike ?) can add all of our modules to 7.5 tree ?
The question is : what is the policy about it ?
For example I'd like to add OpenSSL module there is in pexts since it is working better with current openssl (tested only on FreeBSD's integrated SSL...) and the Ssleay module we currently have.
... my 0,02 :p
/Xavier
/ Brevbäraren