3 Sep
2002
3 Sep
'02
5:25 p.m.
So? That wasn't the function we were talking about. If a function can be implemented as a nop without breaking the programs that use it, such as the case would be for a "change argv[0]" function, then that does go some way towards making it less problematic, yes.
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)
Previous text:
2002-09-03 23:13: Subject: argv[0]?
I seriously doubt the possibility to (perhaps) change the arg or display name in Unix would be hurtful, granted it was marked / documented correctly.
/ David Hedbor (I live in interesting times)