4 Apr
2003
4 Apr
'03
3:35 p.m.
The main goal is to call it less often I'd say (or at least KNOW where it's called). Of course, for most normal sized projects, you wouldn't ever get to a stage where gc time matters.
/ David Hedbor
Previous text:
2003-04-04 22:16: Subject: Predictable gc == manual
That's right. In earlier versions you can still control the gc somewhat by making explicit gc() calls sufficiently frequently, but that's typically not a solution.
If there's a demand for it in 7.4 I wouldn't be against backporting Pike.gc_parameters.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS