28 Sep
2003
28 Sep
'03
7:35 p.m.
No, it hasn't been mentioned at the conference. Personally I don't think it's really worth a new operator.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-09-28 11:43: Subject: zero_type();
I wished for this years ago and suggested the "squiggly pointer" operator ~> so I'm glad to see this idea revived. (The ~> syntax is rather ugly if ~ isn't vertically centered in the current font so perhaps => or ?> works better.)
Any news from the conference regarding this, or were you simply referring to our old discussions?
/ Jonas Walldén