OK. Anyway it is not necessary to distribute it with Pike (bundled). And I think that the Author of PCRE might make changes if we ask.
It is actually more or less nessesary, I don't think it would be a good idea to have one pike version that can have totally different regexp engines.
And if the licenses are compatible, it's not even nessesary to change the license.
And, also, I really do think that it's best to have int32 as the basic type, perhaps compiled like the lexer, though, with different versions for size_shift 0, 1 and 2. Then you don't loose any performance, and get wide-string support.
/ Per Hedbor ()
Previous text:
2003-01-29 18:04: Subject: Re: Real-life PCRE vs Regexp benchmarking
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:55:02PM +0100, Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
MPL/GPL/LGPL, note MPL.
OK. Anyway it is not necessary to distribute it with Pike (bundled). And I think that the Author of PCRE might make changes if we ask.
Regards, /Al
/ Brevbäraren