21 Jun
2004
21 Jun
'04
4:36 a.m.
Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
Well, it looks good except for one problem: If I am not incorrect this no longer bypass the pike-level code when reading from 'pure' FD:s.
That was the reason for the check for t->fd, anyway.
So that means that: - The patch is ok as such, and needed anyway? - The patch is incomplete, and needs to be extended with ... to be able to read from pure FDs?
Or does it mean that the whole if check for t->fd can be scrapped because all things are equal now?
I'm confused, but this is my normal state :-).
--
Sincerely, srb@cuci.nl
Stephen R. van den Berg (AKA BuGless).
"People who think they know everything are annoying to those of us who do."