Name of ADT

No it doesn't. The only argument I have against Sequence is that it may be confusing with a concept and a type both named Sequence. For instance in the description of an algorithm. ... this algorithm takes a Sequence and does ... But that might onthe other hand be a good thing since if you have a type that have every function that the type Sequence have then you know it will work and you don't have to look in the ADT concept documentation. If no one argues I'll go with Sequence then.

/ Peta, jo det är jag

Previous text:

2003-03-05 10:43: Subject: Name of ADT

---

Does it lack any of the properties of a Sequence, as stipulated by the document?

/ Johan Sundström (folkskådare)