3 Jul
2004
3 Jul
'04
5:25 a.m.
When is it correct that something that was an efun on encode shouldn't be one at decode? Maybe your problem is in the codec instead?
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2004-07-03 02:43: Subject: Warnings from startup script
I just checked in a patch to Pike to get rid of that silly "Expected efun constan" in the logfile. The patch works, I'm just wondering if the patch doesn't have any other unexpected side-effects.
The loading is so much faster now, the memory usage is down, the logfiles are clean(er).
/ Stephen R. van den Berg