29 Jan
2003
29 Jan
'03
4:20 a.m.
Yes; somehow I did not consider testing different number of loop iterations for order of-behaviour, when the point I was planning on making was that the entire construct was inappropriate. :-) And not too unfrequent in code written by inexperienced pike programmers.
/ Johan Sundström (a hugging punishment!)
Previous text:
2003-01-29 09:59: Subject: Re: reasons why pike is better than python?
v+=([x:y]) seems to be n² to me, while v[x]=y is n. That is a huge, huge, difference, in my opinion. :)
/ Mirar