4 May
2004
4 May
'04
9:05 p.m.
How about File()->popen()? That would be consistent with current functionality such as File()->connect() and File()->pipe().
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)
Previous text:
2004-05-01 14:27: Subject: Poll
I just checked in Dans patch for a new popen that returns a file object instead of a string under the name fpopen. Would you rather see that popen is incompatibly replaced? If not, make up a better name than fpopen.
/ Martin Nilsson (räfsfiskal)