On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg srb@cuci.nl wrote:
Peter Bortas wrote:
This is not a release candidate. There are some changes without CHANGES and I'm not quite comfortable with the namespace the Debug.Peek functionality is living in.
Any suggestions with regard to where Debug.Peek should live?
Not yet, _my_ primary concern is that it doesn't do anything I would expect with that name. A Peek better come with a Poke. Due to the LysKOM-exporter being busted again* I also don't think you've seen Nilsson's comment:
srb>>I'd appreciate feedback on the implementation and usability of Debug.Peek srb>>(in Pike 8.1).
nilsson>Isn't this more of an application than a module? I.e. shouldn't this nilsson>rather be in the bin directory or in Tools.Standalone?
* I've agreed to take it over, but the final move hasn't been done yet.
I'll comb through the pgsql fixes I committed, some of those were cosmetic though, not worthy of a CHANGES entry.
I didn't see any checkins from you missing in CHANGES. It was something originating from Roxen.
Regards,