On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 01:45:01PM +0000, Johan Sundstr�m (Achtung Liebe!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
Is it "7.<odd>" subtrees you refer to as nonbranches?
no, extra_tests, nt-tools, ulpc, and ulpc.old (although ulpc could be considered a branch)
Is that hard / impossible in git, or is there other reasoning behind putting devel elsewhere?
i don't want to put devel elsewhere. git has absolutely no concept of a trunk, not even by convention. all branches are equal.
Is it the subversion tree you are trying to engit,
i am starting on that now. i copied the dump from pelix and am importing it into a fresh svn repo at the moment (to avoid the load on the network as the git import will then checkout each commit one at a time)
for the git-svn tool it would be most convenient if all branches lived in the same directory. i'll attempt to move them around. (if you have a quick hint how i can achieve that, i'd appreciate it)
or are you still struggling with the very seriously bloodlet history of the cvs tree?
no, that work was mostly a learning excercise (and i learned a lot about git (and maybe a few things about cvs that i didn't want to know :-)
greetings, martin.