o Add a function or option to create_process that conveniently starts a pike interpreter with another pike script.
shouldn't this mean "with the same pike script" ?
No, rather "with the same pike interpreter". To me it doesn't seem that useful to only be able to start the same script again.
for pike i am guessing the better way is to have a function like System.set_process_name(string)
That's exactly what I meant, with the addition that it could just as well change any argument in the array.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-10-05 11:35: Subject: Re: Some tasks from the conference
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:10:04PM +0200, Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum wrote:
o Transfer the pike-community.org contents to a Steam server c/o Martin Baehr.
i have received a huge mail (45 times by now ;-| and will start to disect that soon...
o Add a function or option to create_process that conveniently starts a pike interpreter with another pike script.
shouldn't this mean "with the same pike script" ?
o Add a function to change the argv array of the pike process.
is this the way it is done in c? i thought changing argv was just a convenience method in perl.
for pike i am guessing the better way is to have a function like System.set_process_name(string)
o Implement this_function().
to add to the discussion, (what i learned at the conference) this_function() is mostly usefull in hilfe-like situations, and it is also limited to simple recoursions. (doesn't help in situations where a() calls b() and b() calls a()...
greetings, martin.
/ Brevbäraren