Re: Pike 7.4.10 vs Pike >= 7.4.14

Note the quotes around "mistake". It's just that I don't think any conscious effort ever has been done to handle absolute references in a module to itself. It just happened to start working because of some other change. Maybe the cyclic check got more relaxed than is really healthy somewhere in 7.3 and when that was fixed this case stopped working again. I don't really know; I haven't yet had the time to look into it.

/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS

Previous text:

2003-03-05 08:18: Subject: Re: Pike 7.4.10 vs Pike >= 7.4.14

---

Why wouldn't it work? Because of the self-reference?

It works nicely enough in my 7.5...

/ Mirar