Re: IDA's policy on Pike contributions

That still doesn't mean that there isn't people with CVS access under another agreement.

But it is an error that they are non negotiable. Everything is. That's too strong wording from jhs' part.

/ Martin Nilsson (ja till euro, nej till cent)

Previous text:

2003-09-11 17:15: Subject: Re: IDA's policy on Pike contributions

---

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:10:02AM -0400, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:

...

Where on the policy page did you find such a definition?

There are few. First of all, "rules are non negotiable". Second, there is a phrase: "To get write access to the Pike CVS repository, we require:", where one of requirements is discussed topic. Isn't this "by definition"?

Regards, /Al

/ Brevbäraren