5 Nov
2008
5 Nov
'08
8:15 p.m.
I second that. I suspect the reason why there is no such thing is that the low level search implementation is pretty complex with all its optimizations, so doing the same thing for backward searching would result either in rather extensive code duplication or some quite ugly macro trickery (on top of all the other macro madness already in there). At least that's what stopped me when I've considered fixing it.