30 Jun
2008
30 Jun
'08
7:16 p.m.
I've been following the changes file and just thought I would mention that the subject example includes GNU-makeisms that aren't compatible with standard make.
Also, is it appropriate to recommend that users not use the standard module build method? The sample, while simple, seems to require the inclusion of a lot of rules that already exist in dynamic_module_makefile, however without a lot of the edge case handling.
I'm all for simplification, but I'm concerned that recommending users write modules in this manner will result in a lot of modules floating around that don't build or install properly.
Bill