No, LGPL is not OK if the code is GPL.
(Because the implication goes the other way; LGPL implies GPL, but GPL is more severe/strict, so GPL does not imply LGPL.)
We cannot have GPL or other non-LGPL/MPL compatible code in the pike distribution (or CVS), so if they did not agree to the relicensing, the module can not be included in Pike.
A minor clarification that might or might not be needed; we can of course have such code in CVS, just not in the Pike repository.
/ Johan Sundström (ska bli kalif i stället för kalifen)
Previous text:
2002-10-08 17:55: Subject: Split
No, LGPL is not OK if the code is GPL.
We cannot have GPL or other non-LGPL/MPL compatible code in the pike distribution (or CVS), so if they did not agree to the relicensing, the module can not be included in Pike.
/ Per Hedbor ()