6 Jan
2003
6 Jan
'03
11:08 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:05:01AM +0100, David Hedbor @ Pike developers forum wrote:
Of course, Pike is much better off to begin with so we're doing fine. :) Pike doesn't need as major of a rewrite as some... other languages have had in the past. :-)
well, pike had its rewrite time too, didn't it? if not, you can definetly count lpc4 -> ulpc as a rewrite