4 Aug
2014
4 Aug
'14
4:57 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum 10353@lyskom.lysator.liu.se wrote:
And I'd be inclined to fix any acctual errors, rather than blindly following one or the other. :-)
Just so you know, the MAPPINGS files on unicode.org is not part of the Unicode standard, so they are no more a standard than RFC 1345 is.
Oh! Okay. What is the standard? Where would I find an authoritative set of codepage-to-Unicode character set replacements?
All I can confirm is that, with the changes I put through, Pike agrees with Python 3.4, and codepage 437 "looks right", neither of which is anything official.
ChrisA