The signals/slots are kind of magic but once I understood how they work, I pretty much was ok with it. I can definitely see it being a common issue one would have with Qt.
As for documentation - yes, Qt is so much better in this department. I guess that is a typical example of Commercial vs pure opensource - people that are paid to write documentation...
And yes, funnily enough I tend to prefer GTK apps over Qt apps, but I'm guessing it's not necessarily Qt's fault...
/ David Hedbor
Previous text:
2003-01-07 00:31: Subject: Re: Inconsistency.
Well. The most I've used GTK in pike is to produce alertboxes =) That will probably change if I can find the time.
The problems that I've had with Qt are mostly their horrid preprocessors and macros not doing what I would expect (since they aren't really C++). I did some modifications to make corporate ICQ work with a newer Qt (it was som russian clone of it that I found).
One thing that I adore in Qt though is their documentation (and that's shockingly awfull in GTK-land if you compare).
My main reason for staying with GTK though is that I like a lot of Gnome-software (over similar KDE apps) and I just refuse to install evereything and then some on my box.
/ Peter Lundqvist (disjunkt)