27 Feb
2003
27 Feb
'03
11:30 a.m.
Of course, the consequence would be that all negative numbers would have to be represented as bignums. I kind of doubt that performance would increase... ;-)
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)
Previous text:
2003-02-27 08:11: Subject: Re: 64 bit ints
No, I don't think you'll be able to find someone willing to rewrite the entire Pike code to facilitate a unsigned int type.
It might be possible to compile Pike using unsigned INT32 as INT_TYPE. Maybe most of the neccesary checks are already there... Hmm. It might not be what one really want, though. :)
/ Mirar