25 Jul
2008
25 Jul
'08
5:49 p.m.
Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
object_index_no_free*() will add a reference for the item on the stack, so you need to free the svalue afterwards, which is
Incidentally, what does the "no_free" in object_index_no_free() refer to then? That the target svalue is not freed before overwriting? That the source svalue is not freed, but normally it would have been? And if the latter, then how is that supposed to work, since it wouldn't make much sense to extract the value from the class and then automatically delete it, or?
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Well, if we're going to make a party of it, let's nibble Nobby's nuts!"