2 Oct
2003
2 Oct
'03
noon
Wouldn't that be almost as bad, since the hash is not a hash but a random value. Since I don't know exactly what DO_HASHMEM is supposed to do, and how its arguments relates I just guessed that the increment of "a" was not considered in the loops in DO_IF_ELSE_UNALIGNED_MEMORY, where uninitialized memory is affecting "ret".
/ Martin Nilsson (saturator)
Previous text:
2003-10-02 17:48: Subject: valgrind
Last time I checked that problem I believe it was due to hashing the uninitialized padding bytes within the bounds of a struct. I don't remember the details but I believe it was harmless.
/ Jonas Walldén