11 Feb
2003
11 Feb
'03
9 a.m.
Uhm, no. Preferably not. That would be an artificial limit.
/ Per Hedbor ()
Previous text:
2003-02-11 14:57: Subject: sscanf %O
But sprintf won't produce 'x', so you are not aiming (exactly) for a reversed sprintf("%O"). I think you should.
/ Martin Nilsson (Åskblod)