27 Nov
2002
27 Nov
'02
5:54 p.m.
Ok. Will do. On an unrelated note, could Pike's configure make sure to add a flag (whatever it is) to disable C99 in gcc? I got an error in checked in code because I declared a variable in the function body by mistake. Although it's a nice feature in general, it's not a good feature for a program like Pike.
/ David Hedbor
Previous text:
2002-11-26 12:28: Subject: SDL
I'd say: Please add the bounds checking. It's really annoying when a pike program dumps core. A few extra comparisons shouldn't make much difference given the overhead of a pike function call.
/ Niels Möller ()