3 Sep
2002
3 Sep
'02
5:31 p.m.
What method was being discussed then? Oh, daemonize. Long thread. Had to look back a bunch of levels to see that.
/ David Hedbor (I live in interesting times)
Previous text:
2002-09-03 23:22: Subject: argv[0]?
So? That wasn't the function we were talking about. If a function can be implemented as a nop without breaking the programs that use it, such as the case would be for a "change argv[0]" function, then that does go some way towards making it less problematic, yes.
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)