28 Sep
2003
28 Sep
'03
4:40 a.m.
But that case is simple, because you don't need to test with zero_type. It's where I get confused; when do you need to test with zero_type?
/ Mirar
Previous text:
2003-09-28 10:08: Subject: zero_type();
Perhaps it's a variant of this fairly common case:
if (a && a->b && a->b->c && ...) ...
There's been talk about introducing a shorthand for that as a "safe" variant of ->.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS