More about ADTs

A notice about this in a paragraph in the spec would be nice, to ensure the reader that thought has been applied. I even think it would be good to explicitly list the lfuns that isn't in the API, to make it easier to spot missing lfuns (Anyone feel like documenting the _random lfun?).

/ Martin Nilsson (Fake Build Master)

Previous text:

2002-11-09 20:13: Subject: More about ADTs

---

Yes I know, actually it was a deliberate choise to leave them outside the interface. Since i try to keep the interface as small as possible, just basic, and the +. -, /, %, &, | only work on some ADTs and not others i decided to put them on ADT level instead of on this interface level.

/ Peta, jo det är jag