Re: More about ADTs

The only fancy operators I remember was from the upper half of latin 1. And I don't think it's a good idea to add fancy characters for operators. It's fine for languages like APL, I guess, which were designed from the start to have lots of fancy operators and compact syntax, but pike code should look reasonably similar to C.

/ Niels Möller ()

Previous text:

2002-11-11 21:14: Subject: Re: More about ADTs

---

Perhaps one can find something involving `-, but I rather not have another operator. At least not in the latin-1 table. There were some far reaching plans for how to add operators from the wide collection of special characters in Unicode a while back. Anyone remember anything from that discussion?

/ Martin Nilsson (Fake Build Master)