9 Aug
2004
9 Aug
'04
5:20 a.m.
No, but now most code do malloc(X*Y*foo+1), which probably isn't good when malloc works on blocks bigger than bytes. X*Y*foo tend to have a nice, round size.
/ Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks)
Previous text:
2004-08-09 11:12: Subject: Image.Image
Saving one line of code in the implementation is hardly a good reason for limiting the functionality of the language.
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)