The problem is that you can't do it like that initially. Besides the fact that it would look silly to just have one SIG, you would also have to redesign the layout, structure and stuff quite often when you add new SIGs. One should preferably start with a few good ones (Web applications, System administration tools, Graphics programming, Pike core development) and make them look good and interesting. Then release and hope it grows. Though, we should probably have a SIG-master assigned for each SIG if we are to expect any resemblance of activity... Getting unprovoked activity (or even provoked one) is the hardest. There are 25 accounts that have write permission on the pike site. Essentially only mine and Johans are used.
/ Martin Nilsson (bygger parser
Previous text:
2003-01-07 01:47: Subject: Re: Inconsistency.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 01:40:01AM +0100, Martin Nilsson (bygger parser @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
We should also try to make an effort getting the Special Interest Groups up and running. The problem is that you should really have quite a bit of content before you divide it into special groups, and then we risk getting the community.roxen.com-problem again, where only I was writing a lot of articles.
yes, true, sigs should only be set up one at a time, as the need comes around.
greetings, martin.
interested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen training, sTeam/caudium/roxen and/or unix system administration anywhere in the world. -- pike programmer working in europe csl-gmbh.net open-steam.org (www.archlab|(www|db).hb2).tuwien.ac.at unix bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.(schon.org|root.at) Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
/ Brevbäraren